Archive Page 2

Filthy Fuckers

Okay, it’s been a minute (ha) since I got REALLY angry over something REALLY pathetic (mostly because you get used to that feeling). There is a web site called boobsforbarack, where women are encouraged to “Write a message on your mammories, wear a bra, bathing suit, or go totally bare, if you support Barack, then show IT by showing THEM!”

I wasn’t going link to the site because I don’t think people should click on it. But you can go to the site and take ACTION without giving the nudey parts a click!!

Take a picture of a message of protest to these people and upload it at their sight at boobsforbarack.com

Here are some of the images I sent in already:

There isn’t a lick of information about who runs this site. And a lot of the pictures are photo-shopped models, not real people. But there are real people on there too. What the fuck, ladies? I’m ripping my hair out. Without any other forethought about the misogynist overtones of this website, there is a simple question that I think everyone of us ought know the answer to before hooking up to the internet: DO I WANT TO SEND A PICTURE OF MY BODY TO A WEB SITE WHOSE ORIGINS OR INTENTIONS I DON’T KNOW?

Barack Obama people–I implore you to not let scum bags use your campaign to take advantage of women.

Why I will vote Republican


Way too funny not to share. Thanks to Bust.

Change

There is some sort of point at which change happens. The stories we are reading in my lit. class are by Middle Eastern women about Middle Eastern women, and are mostly subtle expressions of transformation. We are left at the end of almost all of them feeling the emotions behind power struggles of a woman and her home life, a woman and her culture, a woman and her own self-placement. We are also left feeling her loneliness and her sorrow.

Our professor has told us that most of the literature published by women in Middle East is not the most uplifting stuff–most of it is sad, frustrating, fraught with abuse and control, and lonely. It is vastly different from the American literature that I have studied in the past–full of hope and intrigue and life, along with some of the sorrow of course.

The transformative parts of these stories, though, is what our questions have been directed at as of late. In all of the stories, the protagonist is coming to an intersection in her mind and soul about her life. Some event, taken place over two days or two months or even just an hour, is telling us, the reader, that this woman is no longer participating in old dynamics–she has become fed up, she has had a realization of some sort.

But then, in most of them, that’s where we are left. We don’t know what she is going to do next, now that she has found out her husband wants to take another wife, once she finds out that her husband has had an affair, once she has realized that the lower-class day laborer working for her treats her infant as tenderly as she wishes a lover would treat her, once she finds out that the lies she is telling herself in order to keep quietly sedated in “happinees” won’t really work anymore.

In our last class we read a story that had the ending we all cheered for: an abused wife finally walks out on her husband after five years. The woman in this story had run into an old friend who was happy, healthy, pretty, and owned her own apartment and raised her child on her own–she was happy and independent. And BAM, just like that our protagonist understood that her life was not her own.

And BAM, my classmates and I had the second piece of the puzzle, according to our professor: vision for something different and the hope and belief that it could be acquired.

I’m still mulling over this concept–the idea that change happens when 1) people simply can’t do “it” anymore; and 2) a creative idea for something different is believed in and hoped for.

I keep coming back to: Yeah, but 1) Even if women are fed up with patriarchy and misogyny, we don’t have the power so what does it matter? Doesn’t it also require the men to be fed up? OR 2) Say women can make the change themselves (being that you can’t keep the same dynamic if one-half of the interaction simply changes their part in it), how many of us does it take? Per community/per country/in the world altogether?

Flexing Feminism and Basic Human Rights

Lots of other bloggers have commented on the vile hate messages women bloggers get from the troglodytes out there in cyberspace. They aren’t men, they’re boys with Internet access without adult supervision.

Some time ago I read a news article about this, and sadly, some women bloggers stopped blogging because a few of these knuckle-scrapers sank to threats, and possibly knew where the women bloggers lived.

Which brings to mind a sad fact of the Internet: if you’re a woman and you’ve secured anonymity, you can blog in safety. On the other hand, gender bigots and woman haters out there also have anonymity, and if they know enough about you, they can make threats from behind the mask of anonymity—or worse, carry out those threats.

Still, women bloggers do have a good degree of safety and anonymity, and the troglodytes can’t stop us from blogging. They know it, and that’s what drives them around the bend.

Bloggers who use Internet anonymity as protection from threats or physical harm are not cowards, but only the most pathetic cowards use that anonymity to threaten others.

They can’t do a damned thing about what we say, can’t stop us from saying it in public. So we should take courage in that. When overgrown boys throw hissy fits at us because they hate us and our freedom, we take it as high praise, as an encouraging sign that we’re stronger than them and their hate, that we’re reaching goals they want to withhold from us.

Still, I recall fondly graffiti I saw years ago on a wall in London: “Take the toys from the boys.”

Feminism, by definition, needs to show attitude. Real attitude.

Can She Get A Witness?

This morning I was listening to NPR as usual during my morning routine, and I have to say I am pretty disappointed because of their lack of coverage on how misogynist the media has been towards Hillary.

A woman was speaking when I first woke up to the radio alarm, a reporter for NPR reflecting on how the first female candidate for president has made some kind of impact on her as a woman and probably the rest of the world too, regardless that Hillary may not have even gotten her vote. Well that’s awesome, really it is.It’s just that the piece was just…well, it was weak. The reporter looks back to when she covered Geraldine Ferraro’s selection to the Democratic vice presidential position in 1984, the first woman to get to that spot, and ends the piece with a description of another female colleague and herself tearing up, still all well and good. But the impact of that short piece was less a tribute to how incredibly remarkable this even is, it came off with the taste of letting the girls have some fun for a while–oh look, a lady tearing up, how cute…

I was also left with this feeling of . . . but . . . but that’s it? What about all of the sexism and misogyny in the reporting around her? What about all of the really sickly pessimistic way so many people are predicting there won’t be another female candidate for president in a generation or more? Why are you still not covering this NPR?

How can we just kiss Hillary off with a “Well you did good, and we won’t forgetchya gal”? I’m not talking about political platforms and who is a better candidate, I’m talking about the mistreatment Hillary has been getting, and all women have been getting by extension.

Next, NPR’s David Greene is on with a a few interviews and close ups he’d done with Hillary earlier on in the race up through a few weeks ago. NPR’s aim was obviously to leave listeners with the feeling that Hillary did a good job, had supporters who told her NOT to give up (while pundits and commentators yelled that she is a sore loser for not quitting earlier), but still, I was left hurt and unfulfilled by it. First of all, why hadn’t NPR aired Greene’s interviews two months ago when almost nothing positive about her was being aired?

And secondly, why no in-depth discussion on the sexism in this race, the misogyny? I’m deeply disappointed with NPR.

The blatant hate that people spewed at Hillary this campaign needs to be accounted for, and the hate messages that came from middle-class liberals and others’ tacit support of it especially needs to be accounted for.

And if you’re still saying to yourself, what more do you want? Here is example the likes of which I wish NPR would cover so brilliantly so that more people would be exposed to it. It’s a post by a brilliant blogger, Melissa McEwan, that does more justice to the issue: For the Record.

And if you liked that, here’s her response to all of the misogynist responses she got to that post.

PS–If any of you have heard NPR cover this issue better, please let us know in the comments section.

I Have to Vent: It’s the Conservatives, Stupid!

Okay, that isn’t a very civil title, but the stakes are high and I can’t contain myself.

I’m a 55-year-old white woman. Our greatest matter of urgency is to be sure a Democrat becomes President in November, and to get as many Democrats as possible elected to both houses of Congress. We’ve also got to do that at the local, grassroots levels. When we’re finished doing that, we’ve got to hold the Democrats accountable for what they do or don’t do. We’ve got to demand representation, respect, and results. If they descend to the depths of the Republicans—or even come close—, we need to fire them all and hire new elected officials. We need to repeat the process until they get the message that we mean business. We need to be uppity women and citizens.

I’ve never supported any political candidate enough to campaign or canvass for them. I’ve observed them all, and none of them inspires my impassioned belief in them. And until now I’ve been able to keep a respectful silence while others with very strong feelings for either Democratic Presidential candidate have public melt-downs when their candidate has a political setback.

I can’t keep quiet now. I’ve just been watching a white woman in my age group on CNN going radioactive about how she’s going to vote for John McCain if HIllary Rodham Clinton doesn’t get the Democratic nomination. She gave as her rationale for this chop-off-your-nose-to-spite-your-face tactic that the Democratic party has turned on its women supporters.

To this woman, if you and others like you are reading this: Im sure you aren’t in the majority of Clinton supporters. But you’d like the proven record of Republican conservatives for their all-out war on women’s rights? We’re now paying the price for three decades of conservative domination in America—what it’s done to the American character; the fact of American commerce now as morally bankrupt as it is; the abuses of Wall Street; the abuse of the environment; the poisonous cynicism and corruption of this administration; the use of torture, illegal wiretaps—I could go on for pages.

Back to the issue of women’s rights. You, Screaming Woman: you are old enough to remember the pre-Roe v. Wade days in America. Remember coat hangers, Drano, women hurtling themselves down stairs, illegal abortions performed on garage floors without anesthesia? Remember women dying and left unable to bear children from illegal botched abortions? Remember birth control—even birth control information—outlawed? Remember the early 1970s, when a woman could not get a credit card or a bank loan in her own name—when a woman needed an adult male co-signer’s permission for them because we were deemed incompetent to manage our own financial affairs? Remember gender-segregated “Help Wanted” ads, with the best-paying jobs always in the “MALE HELP WANTED” column? Remember when sexual harassment and sex discrimination were legal? Remember when a woman being used as a punching bag by her husband had no recourse—no earning power, no options, and when the police she turned to often were abusers themselves and sympathized with the husband? Remember when we had no rape shield laws and when marital rape was legal? Remember when domestic violence shelters weren’t even a twinkle in anyone’s eye?

If I remember all of that—and I do—then you do, too, Screaming Woman. Republicans fought the changes that spare today’s women the horrors and humiliations they endured then, and too often still do. Give the Republican Party platform a close reading. They want to return us to those days, want it so bad they can taste it. And because the Democratic Party enacts a decision you (and maybe I) don’t agree with, you’re really going to show them, aren’t you, and vote for McCain? The same McCain who, in front of a group of people and in a fit of mouth-frothing rage, called his wife a cunt? The same McCain who mocked Chelsea Clinton—a child at the time—as ugly? The same McCain who vows to appoint Supreme Court justices who will vote to overturn Roe v. Wade? The same McCain who laughed when a Republican woman asked him, on camera, “How do we beat the bitch?”—referring to Clinton, your candidate of choice? The Democratic Party’s decision is worse than this?

Please. Get things in perspective. I do not consent to watching Republicans—the American Taliban—imposing their misogynistic agenda on my nieces. Grow up. I seldom use language this strong, and I understand your anger. No one wants to see a woman President more than I do. But remember who our adversaries are. Remember what theyr’e made of, remember the damage they’ve done already and the worse damage they will surely do if we vote them back into power. Truly, Screaming Woman, I cannot wrap my brain around any woman willing to hand all American’s women over to these American Taliban if Clinton doesn’t get the nomination.

You implied in your meltdown that the Democratic Party is making a calculated effort to prevent a woman from winning the nomination because she’s a woman. News flash: it’s possible to support Obama and not be a misogynistic goon.

I had to get that out of my system. Now please, calm down and do this. Think critically, interpret accurately what the candidates say and do, reach informed decisions based on their judgment, character, track record, and positions on the issues, and don’t abuse the vote—a precious right—that women fought so courageously to win.

Some Skims

“Sexism Sells But We’re Not Buying It”

Hearing all of these opinions in one video is sickening. Head over to the Women’s Media Center to sign the petition.

Rape of women not the only sex casualty of war and disaster

Wow. The news is vibrating with reports of a Save The Children UK  report on child sexual abuse by UN Peace Keepers and other humanitarian aid workers in conflict areas around the world.

BBC reported.

MSNBC reported

Feminist Majority Foundation reported

Save The Children interviewed hundreds of children in Southern Sudan, the Ivory Coast and Haiti, and found that children are being trafficked, raped, used as prostitutes and pornography. Unsurprisingly, many don’t speak up.

Girls=Evil

How cute! All you need is some good, deductive reasoning and BAM! Insight!

« Previous PageNext Page »